HSCO 506 Quiz 4 Professional Identity solutions complete answers

HSCO 506 Quiz 4 Professional Identity solutions complete answers 

 

From the lecture, there were several reasons why someone will have a resistance to confession. Which answer below is NOT one of those reasons?

 

The lectures reviewed Nouwen’s concept of “hospitality” in counseling. What is true from that discussion?

 

When putting together your informed consent document for a client, what item should you include as part of that document?

 

Which statement below is true concerning the work of the Holy Spirit in counseling?

 

Which answer below is NOT one of the ethical concerns given regarding confrontation?

 

The lectures talked about attributional styles. What is true from that discussion?

 

The lecture explained how psychology would explain the “concept of sin.” What is a true statement from that discussion?

 

Based on McMinn’s counseling “map,” the lecture posed a series of questions to help a client identify where the client was in terms of self/need/relationship. What is a true statement from that discussion?

 

From the lecture, in questioning yourself regarding ethical decision-making, which answer is NOT used?

 

From McMinn’s discussion on confrontation during counseling (as reviewed in the lecture) what is a true statement?

 

As we consider “sin” as a factor in human problems and behavior, the perspective from psychology is that psychopathology, rather than a sin nature, is the cause of emotional problems.

 

The lectures talked about counseling ethics guiding how we directly confront clients about their behavior. From that lecture, what is a true statement?

 

Which answer below describes what should be on the professional disclosure statement to the client?

 

From the perspective of secular psychology, the concept of “sin” can best be described as 

 

McMinn emphasizes that the counselor’s motivation needs to be examined as the counselor confronts the client. What is a true statement based on that discussion?

 

When a Christian counselor looks at the role of sin in client problems, what is a true statement?

 

Which statement is NOT true regarding ethical standards for counseling practice?

 

The lectures distinguished the effects of “original sin” and “personal sins.” What is true from that discussion?

 

McMinn (as reviewed in the lectures) describes several ways to confront sin in the life of a counselee. What factors should a counselor take into account before choosing one of the confrontation techniques?

 

It is important that counselors help clients overcome resistance to legitimate confession. Which of the following statements does NOT fit with the lecture emphasis in that discussion?

 

In the lecture, according to Ohlschlager, what are some of the most common legal or ethical pitfalls?

 

The lectures talked about some important points with regard to confidentiality. What is a true statement from that discussion?

 

It is rarely helpful in counseling to confront a client about the client’s attribution style.

 

A client with an internal attribution style would want to just feel better about themselves as a result of counseling.

 

Whether a client has a sense of conscience will be a clue to the client’s attributional style.

 

Christian counseling would conclude that change can happen without confronting sin.

 

As we consider “sin” as a factor in human problems and behavior, the concept of external attribution would place the blame for human choices on the individual person.

 

With regard to the concept of “sin” in Christian counseling, it is appropriate to focus on helping a client to primarily reduce their guilt and inner turmoil about their bad behavior?